Zen3+ Energy and Efficiency Scaling

Earlier this 12 months, AMD introduced an replace to its cell processor line that we weren’t anticipating fairly so quickly. The corporate up to date its Ryzen 5000 Cellular processors, that are primarily based round Zen3 and Vega cores, to Ryzen 6000 Cellular, which use Zen3+ and RDNA2 cores. The bounce from Vega to RDNA2 on the graphics facet was a component we had been anticipating sooner or later, however the emergence of a Zen3+ core was very intriguing. AMD gave us a small pre-brief, saying that the core is similar to Zen3, however with ~50 new energy administration options and strategies inside. With the primary laptops primarily based on these chips now delivery, we have been despatched one of many flagship fashions for a fast check.

AMD Ryzen 6000 Cellular

Zen3+ and RDNA2 Equals Rembrandt

Everybody loves a very good codename, and the silicon behind these new cell processors is named Rembrandt, following AMD’s cadence of naming its cell processors after painters. Constructed on the TSMC N6 course of node, Rembrandt is likely one of the first merchandise to make use of this node enhancement and get some further voltage/frequency advantages of the up to date course of. That includes 8 Zen3+ compute cores and as much as 12 RDNA2 compute items for graphics, the monolithic Rembrandt die is designed to scale all the way in which throughout AMD’s pocket book portfolio, from thin-and-light notebooks down at 15 W all the way in which as much as cell workstation-level efficiency at 65 W.

AMD Ryzen 6000 Cellular CPUs

‘Rembrandt’ on 6nm 
AnandTech C/T Base




H-Sequence 35W+
Ryzen 9 6980HX 8/16 3300 5000 12 2400 45W+
Ryzen 9 6980HS 8/16 3300 5000 12 2400 35W
Ryzen 9 6900HX 8/16 3300 4900 12 2400 45W+
Ryzen 9 6900HS 8/16 3300 4900 12 2400 35W
Ryzen 7 6800H 8/16 3200 4700 12 2200 45W
Ryzen 7 6800HS 8/16 3200 4700 12 2200 35W
Ryzen 5 6600H 6/12 3300 4500 6 1900 45W
Ryzen 5 6600HS 6/12 3300 4500 6 1900 35W
U-Sequence 15W-28W
Ryzen 7 6800U 8/16 2700 4700 12 2200 15-28W
Ryzen 5 6600U 6/12 2900 4500 6 1900 15-28W
12 CU RDNA2 Graphics is marketed as Radeon 680M

6 CU RDNA2 Graphics is marketed as Radeon 660M

For our testing immediately, we have now the Ryzen 9 6900HS, which is within the prime tier product line however designed to be a power-optimized product that AMD makes use of with choose companions primarily based on a collaborative design strategy. Something with the HS on the finish implies that AMD has been concerned within the planning, design, and optimization – the objective right here is that AMD desires the HS elements, which have been chosen from manufacturing with the perfect performance-to-power ratio, as showcasing the Ryzen model at its greatest.

New Options

For this new core to maneuver from 7nm Zen3 to 6nm Zen3+, various new additions to the microarchitecture have been made. Usually we think about this to be both a easy manufacturing optimization as a result of course of node change, or one thing extra basic to the core when there’s a microarchitectural change. On this case, AMD hasn’t actually mentioned any particular enhancements coming from the smaller course of node, as a substitute specializing in enhancements made to the SoC as a complete. On the announcement of the {hardware}, the headline was ’50 enhancements regarding energy’, and with the {hardware} launched we now have perception into what various these are.

Essentially, the bottom CPU core is identical Zen3 microarchitecture because the earlier technology. Clock for clock, AMD is anticipating Zen3+ to behave the identical as Zen3 in uncooked efficiency output/IPC, with the adjustments being solely on the energy stage. Essentially AMD is saying that various the libraries used within the design have been power-optimized, whereas nonetheless protecting a high-frequency functionality. Usually a power-optimized design equipment gives low energy and low space on the expense of frequency, so in actuality AMD is discovering what it considers to be a extra optimum level in that spectrum.

AMD highlighted the next as ‘microarchitecture’ enhancements:

  • Per-Thread Energy/Clock Management: Somewhat than being per core, every thread can carry necessities
  • Leakage: Optimized course of and design parts up to date for higher effectivity
  • Delayed L3 Initialization: Removes the necessity to look forward to L3 to completely wake from an idle state, making it asynchronous
  • Peak Present Management: Higher management of energy ramp from idle to peak to scale back stress and save energy
  • Cache Dirtiness Counter: If cache misses are excessive (workload is larger than L3), keep in a excessive energy state even when low energy is requested to scale back total energy use
  • CPPC Per Thread: Beforehand the OS was solely conscious of workloads per core, now could be conscious per-thread for finer management
  • PC6 Restore: {Hardware}-assisted wake-from-sleep for fast response
  • Selective SCFCTP Save: Earlier than waking up cores, discuss with utilization earlier than PC6 sleep
  • Enhanced CC1 State: Higher sleep management when core is idle

With this being a cell chip, plenty of context right here is on energy saving and responsiveness when in-and-out of sleep. The idea of protecting cores at a low idle energy, or transferring to sleep when idle, is all in help of enabling a tool with a protracted(er) battery life. For instance, if a core is idle for a couple of seconds, would it not be higher to place in a sleep state? This isn’t simply idle frequency, however really turning elements of the core off in a particular order – after which how and when these elements are turned again on, which has an influence value all of its personal – in the end resulting in working smarter to be able to preserve energy utilization.

On the SoC facet of energy issues, AMD is showcasing that Rembrandt has higher management over the inner Infinity Cloth energy states, higher international ‘nearly off’ energy states, help for LPDDR5, DRAM self-refresh, panel self refresh help, help for sub-1W panels, and accelerators to assist come again out of sleep states, a few of which we’ve talked about.

On the firmware and software program facet, AMD is aiming to make Rembrandt a greater transitional expertise from being linked to energy to being a cell platform. Usually Home windows depends on inner energy plans for ‘Balanced’, ‘Excessive Efficiency’, or ‘Battery Saver’ – typically OEMs even have their very own distinctive energy plans on prime of their very own software program. From AMD’s perspective, they need customers to have the advantages of each Excessive Efficiency and Battery Saver with out having to manually modify these energy plans. Which brings us to AMD’s new Energy Administration Framework, or PMF.

PMF is an extension of plenty of earlier pocket book inputs, outputs, and controls – taking information from sensors akin to pores and skin temperature, but additionally SoC energy, OS workloads, show info, noise profiles, then changing that right into a ramping energy profile that may supply something from battery saver to excessive efficiency on a sliding scale.

The important thing right here is that graph – regular Home windows choices have these particular person three factors, whereas AMD Rembrandt, on choose optimized methods, will allow by default a scalable profile that can transfer up and down the graph relying on exterior elements. When talking to AMD, they mentioned that this is able to be baked into the firmware and mechanically enabled when working within the Home windows-standard Balanced Profile. Consumer can manually choose different profiles to drive into these modes, however Balanced Profile would be the PMF sliding scale.

Customers won’t be able to disable PMF, however greater than that, AMD states that it’s as much as the system vendor to announce if they’re utilizing PMF or not. Provided that it is seemingly that few (if any) of them will hassle to make that disclosure, I feel that is considerably of a irritating determination – we will’t check this and not using a lever to disable it, whereas end-users received’t know if their system even has it or not.

Lastly, AMD lists its updates for Rembrandt within the show energy part of the chip. As we transfer to extra environment friendly processors coupled with high-resolution, excessive refresh price panels, the facility consumption of the panel is turning into a significant factor. However a part of it’s all the way down to the SoC inside.

We’ve already talked about Panel Self Refresh, the flexibility for a panel to replace solely the part that has really modified from body to border, however AMD is saying that they will additionally do that with Freesync enabled. On prime of this, Freesync permits the refresh price throughout video fullscreen playback to be diminished to the native framerate of the video (e.g. 23.976Hz), thus saving energy. The sub 1-watt panel help implies that AMD has a listing of validated panel distributors that may present decrease energy panels (sometimes 1080p at 300 nits) for lengthy battery life designs. Bodily the brand new chip additionally implements new SVI3 regulators, which AMD claims offers a sooner and extra discrete management over the voltage required from the chip.

On prime of that is the graphics engine itself, Rembrant strikes from a Vega 8 answer to an RDNA2 answer, providing extra efficiency and higher effectivity. This extends to AMD A+A Benefit help as nicely, providing superior energy management when paired with an AMD discrete graphics answer.

Briefly, every part concerning the new chip is about management: going to sleep, and waking from sleep as shortly as potential.

15W vs 28W

General, we’re getting to some extent within the laptop computer area the place the distributors at the moment are competing towards one another on precise energy consumption. Traditionally we’d discuss U-series cell processors at 15-28 watts, after which H-series at 45-65+ watts. In 2022, Intel has launched P-series at 28 watts as a substitute, and each firms are stating that resulting from enhancements in design, the chassis that used to suit a 15-watt processor can now allow a 28-watt model.

Because of this, we’re seeing some actually awkward comparisons in the event you go by official numbers. Each AMD and Intel are evaluating last-generation 15-watt options to current-generation 28-watt options, or evaluating 28 watt methods immediately towards equal designs that housed different processors earlier than. Watch out when studying these first-party information factors. That being mentioned, each firms additionally wish to exhibit their pocket book processors at their greatest, so we find yourself with the higher-powered H collection anyway in some good chonky designs. It received’t be till reviewers can get their arms on the common, run-of-the-mill U/P collection {hardware} that they’re going to have the option check like-for-like in the identical manner.

Our Evaluate Unit

For the preliminary evaluation, AMD shipped us the ASUS Zephyrus G14, one of many latest technology flagship fashions which can be up to date year-on-year with the newest {hardware}. We nonetheless have the G14 that was shipped with the Ryzen 4000 Cellular (Zen 2) collection, though for the Ryzen 5000, AMD went with the ASUS Circulate X13, which is a extra ultraportable design. The G14 continues to be in that bracket with a barely bigger display screen, barely beefier discrete graphics, and a bit extra battery. There’s even an AniMe Matrix show on the again.


AMD has paired every of those designs with the HS-branded processors. The HS fashions are tuned and optimized elements that AMD co-calibrates inside flagship pocket book designs with its companions, so it turns into the plain selection for AMD to pattern laptops primarily based on these chips for every launch for evaluation. Not solely that, relying on the thermal design of the laptop computer, the precise energy setting offered by the seller can change primarily based on the design. We’ve had the next in for check:

  • Ryzen 9 6900HS in an ASUS Zephyrus G14 (45W Default, 65W Turbo) + RX 6800S GPU
  • Ryzen 9 5980HS in an ASUS Circulate X13 (15W Default, 35W Turbo) + GTX 1650
  • Ryzen 9 4900HS in an ASUS Zephyrus G14 (35W Turbo) + GTX 2060 GPU

As with most laptop computer processor launches, regardless of the rated TDP on the official processor itemizing, it’s as much as the OEMs to configure and tune the precise efficiency to the cooling on every unit. This makes comparisons, apart from merely ‘chip vs chip’, fairly troublesome, as merely adjusting the processor frequency (slightly than every other frequencies) has a direct impression on any IPC or performance-per-watt comparability. Because of this, we depend on end-performance numbers primarily based on the CPUs as shipped – however we’ve additionally examined the 6900HS in 35W mode simply to see the distinction.

The opposite massive consider our ASUS Zephryus G15 goes to be the DDR5 reminiscence. As we’ve seen on different platforms, transferring to DDR5 could cause a wide range of adjustments in efficiency for each CPU and gaming – it relies upon how reminiscence bandwidth dependent the assessments have been. That is much more true for AMD, provided that the reminiscence frequency can also be tied into the infinity material frequencies contained in the processor. Over time AMD has disaggregated the 2, however there’s nonetheless a stage of synchronicity concerned with further dividers, that means that reminiscence frequency continues to be an vital issue.

Supply By https://www.anandtech.com/present/17276/amd-ryzen-9-6900hs-rembrandt-benchmark-zen3-plus-scaling